Talk:European Data Point Methodology V2.0
From XBRLWiki
| Revision as of 13:49, 23 August 2013 (edit) Thierry.Declerck (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 14:10, 23 August 2013 (edit) Thierry.Declerck (Talk | contribs) (→Comment-06) Next diff → |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| [TD] Suggestion by I.: “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension can refer to a Domain. ….”. I would exchange by in “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension must refer to a Domain. ….”. | [TD] Suggestion by I.: “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension can refer to a Domain. ….”. I would exchange by in “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension must refer to a Domain. ….”. | ||
| === Comment-06 === | === Comment-06 === | ||
| + | [TD] Comment by I. :“4.6 Hierarchical Perspective …. 1) When using multiple DimensionedElements on a single Dimension that has a Hierarchy in its DefinedMembers, the required math may not be possible to perform.”. I don’t understand. Only, it is possible to define a data point with only a member domain by dimension. Is this that you want to say? | ||
| + | |||
| === Comment-07 === | === Comment-07 === | ||
| === Comment-08 === | === Comment-08 === | ||
Revision as of 14:10, 23 August 2013
Contents |
Comments
Comment-01
[TD] Or better "Introduction" for section title? (comment "b" in the file Comments about CEN/TC XBRL)
Comment-02
[TD] Ignacio suggests "In the page 7, figure: Figure 1 —Structural Perspective, the cardinality of 1 is not necessary. [TD: I can not change the graphics]
Comment-03
[TD] Ignacio suggests here to repleace the sentence above the comment with: "In the DataPointModel a Hierarchy forms are sets of concepts of a domain (DefinedMembers) of a dimension (EnumerableDimension) arranged in a hierarchical disposition." Myself I note a problem with the expression: "a Hierarchy forms are sets" (should it bee "a Hierarchy forms sets ..."?
Comment-04
[TD] Suggestion by I. replace "A Module is a group of DataCubes that carry relevant identical semantics and may serve the reporting process" with "A Module is a group of DataPoints with its appropriate Dimensions and concepts of the dimension (DataCubes) ...."
Comment-05
[TD] Suggestion by I.: “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension can refer to a Domain. ….”. I would exchange by in “4.3.10 Dimension, …. A Dimension must refer to a Domain. ….”.
Comment-06
[TD] Comment by I. :“4.6 Hierarchical Perspective …. 1) When using multiple DimensionedElements on a single Dimension that has a Hierarchy in its DefinedMembers, the required math may not be possible to perform.”. I don’t understand. Only, it is possible to define a data point with only a member domain by dimension. Is this that you want to say?
